12 Comments

  • C K V Kurup says:

    Dear Office bearers of AIKVTA,
    KVS is sending MACP file to MHRD and MHRD is returning the file back to KVS with a query and this process is going on for the past 2 yrs and the time will elapse till the 7th pay commission is constituted.This is their hidden agenda.What MHRD is to do is to allot more funds to KVS for implementation of MACP for Teachers.The wiallain is MHRD officials by returning the files to KVS on one pretext or the other.
    KVS did not face any shortage of Fund to start 7 regions and to sanction 7 posts of Dcs and 21 ACs with out any budgetary provisions.KVS officials could succeed in getting the designation modified .DCs became all JCs and all ACs to DCs and similar upgradation for the other posts.In the next pay commission they may get a bonus.Poor teachers remain as bonded labourers.What is going on in KVS is multiplicity of making records, No time for creative teaching, teachers are running behind records,awards.They are not knowing what they are doing.
    KVS is a pace setter and showing how RTE could be implemented by increasing the working time from 6hrs 10 mts to 7hrs 30 mts without giving any benefits to teachers.If RTE is to be implemented, all provisions of RTE should be implemented and to be shown .This is pure hypocracy.Teachers remain without any promotion for 20 t0 25 Yrs.Education became a business, a commodity.
    Association office bearers should recognise the importance of unity and democracy and work for the welfare of teaching community.
    C K V Kurup,Calicut(Retd)

  • Bishakha Rao says:

    Sir,
    With reference to the comments of Mr. C K V Kurup, I just wanted to say that we should all be obliged to Mr. Kurup for his detailed observations on the affairs of KVS. The Officers like ACs, DCs are getting their work done through BOG without any reference to any quarter. But when it comes to tahcer’s interest they suddenly rememebr MHRD, Min of Finance etc.

    My sincere request to our AIKVTA Office bearers that

    PLEASE DON’T WAIT A SECOND MORE
    PLEASE DON’T WAIT A SECOND MORE
    PLEASE DON’T WAIT A SECOND MORE
    PLEASE DON’T WAIT A SECOND MORE
    PLEASE DON’T WAIT A SECOND MORE

    BUT APPROACH COURT OF LAW FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF MACP FOR KVS TEACHERS.

    Otherwise, the members won’t tolerate such a non-serious approach to our demands.

  • s k das says:

    SCREENING BASED DEPT EXAM,MACP & E.L. ISSUES HAVE TO BE RESOLVED BY AIKVTA.
    ALL SHOULD STAND BEHIND AIKVTA & AIKVTA SHOULD WORK WITHOUT FEAR.
    I DOUBT SINCERITY OF AIKVTA FOR NOT SUBMITTING ITS WRITE UP REGARDING FITNESS BASED DEPT EXAM.MERIT BASED DEPT EXAM IS NOT GOOD FOR FRESHERS ALSO.

  • I.R.DUBEY says:

    It is matter of grave concern that senior scale and selection grade implemented by 5th cpc which have no space and scope in 6th cpc are still existing and made applicable only in kvs.To my mind there is only MACP existing as per 6th cpc.

  • RV SINGH says:

    As one of my friend said that court of law,you still hope when cat case is pending from one year

  • RAJ KUMAR says:

    OFFICE BEARERS R UNABLE TO PUT THE MATTER BEFORE KVS IN SCIENTIFIC & AUTHENTIC MANNERS

  • Prithvi says:

    Solves should take papers for promotion policy from jnv teachers where seniority is given precedent along with simple qualifying marks for limited departmental exam pl do something for senior techers also

  • RAJKUMAR says:

    I want to ask every office bearer under what rule the the KV is using the words Commssioner for AC,DC, and even JC while most them are not appointed through UPSC and are promoted through Principal and E.O.
    Another fact for RTE WHICH face off the officer is that KVS is the only teaching organisation which has removed the facility of FEE EXEMPTION IN case of Single Girl Child whose parents are eligible for child care allowance.But if her parents are earning lacs of Rs. for Cat.-5 students they are elegible for fee exemption.I want to point out that the parents of singele girl child are not the poor and they are not getting fee exemption from GOI as they can not afford but as an incentive for having only one child.This shows the autocratic attitued of Kv and same should be put on the hearing date on 01 May.

    • pv dwivedi says:

      Why ask this question to Office Bearers rather than you asking this question to KVS/ Govt.Of India directly? Lets not try to fire every bullet keeping the gun on Association’s shoulder.Lets be brave to take up some issues ourselves as free citizens of this country and responsible, free thinking members of KV teaching community.There is RTI act to help you in this regard.

  • RAJKUMAR says:

    What a Joke a ministry denying the facilty of CGHS on the pretext of shortage of Manpower. Should the teacher do the same thing.No admission beyond the capacity of 30 students per class..Loktantra Jindabad

  • RAJKUMAR says:

    i am asking them as i have very limited knownledge about KVS functiontion.They as an oldy perhaps have any information about it.

  • G.VARAPRASAD says:

    MACP: It can not be stopped for teachers as per the letter 22023/1/2012 from the Under Secretary to GOI, Ministry of Personal, P.G Pensions, Department of Personal & Training, North Block, New Delhi-110001. The said letter was sent to the Secretary, MHRD, Shashtri Bhawan, New Delhi for further action.
    Main issue misrepresented was that KVS teachers were not entitled for ACP benefit in V pay commission, therefore VI pay MACP is denied; whereas ,when VI pay rules are enforced, the permutations of V pay rules are null and void.Now the VI pay rules for enforcement, and non-compliance of the same is unconstitutional. Teachers are mute spectators. Any query could be sent to the US, Ministry of Personal for ready reference of rules and ratification on this issue, please.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*